If you’re getting SQL Server error 7999 that reads something like “Could not find any index named ‘IX_LastName’ for table ‘Employees’“, it appears that you’re trying to create an index with the DROP_EXISTING argument ON, but there is no existing index of that name.
When we set the DROP_EXISTING argument to ON, SQL Server tries to look for the index to drop before it recreates it with the new definition. If it doesn’t exist, then we get the error.
If you’re getting an error in SQL Server that reads “Incorrect syntax near the keyword ‘Order’“, it could be because you’re using the word Order (or another reserved keyword) in your SQL code.
The 156 error itself merely indicates a syntax error, so there could be a multitude of reasons you might be getting this error. But when it refers to the keyword 'Order', this could suggest that you’re trying to use the word Order as an identifier (such as a column name, table name, etc).
If you’re getting an error that reads something like “Incorrect syntax near the keyword ‘ON’“, it appears that you’re trying to recreate an existing index, but you’re using the wrong syntax for the DROP_EXISTING argument.
The same error occurs when using the wrong syntax to set DROP_EXISTING to OFF; “Incorrect syntax near the keyword ‘OFF’“.
Either way, to fix this issue, be sure to use the right syntax.
Continue readingIf you’re getting SQL Server error 4145 that goes something like “An expression of non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected…“, it’s probably because you’re using a boolean-like syntax in the wrong context.
This error occurs when a non-boolean expression is used in a context where a condition (i.e., something that evaluates to true or false) is expected. This often happens in IF statements, CASE expressions, or WHERE clauses when a value that isn’t a boolean is mistakenly used as a condition.
Even when we do use a boolean value, we can still get this error if we use it in the wrong context.
Continue readingWhen we have a column that’s defined as a composite type in PostgreSQL, we have some options when it comes to inserting data. For example, we can explicitly specify each individual field of the composite type, or we can use a row constructor to insert all fields at once.
Below are four different options for inserting composite values into a column in PostgreSQL.
Continue readingIf you’re getting SQL Server error 107 that goes something like “The column prefix ‘e’ does not match with a table name or alias name used in the query“, look at your column prefix.
This error occurs when we use the asterisk wildcard (*) that’s incorrectly qualified with a column prefix. The prefix, if provided, must match a table name or alias name. If you’re using a table alias, then you must use that instead of the table name.
When writing queries in SQL, we sometimes need to summarize data based on specific criteria. Fortunately SQL makes this easy to achieve with the GROUP BY and HAVING clauses. These two clauses allow us to aggregate data and filter the results based on group conditions.
More specifically, GROUP BY allows us to group the results, and HAVING is an optional clause that we can use to filter the results based on certain conditions.
Below is an example of where we can use these two clauses to aggregate data and filter it based on certain criteria.
Continue readingYou may be aware that PostgreSQL has a couple of functions that allow us to concatenate strings. In particular, the concat() function allows us to concatenate multiple strings into one string, and the concat_ws() function allows us to do the same, but to also specify a separator for the concatenated strings.
But did you know that we have the ability to pass an array to these functions?
Continue readingIf you’re getting SQL Server error 547 that reads something like “The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint “FK_Projects_DepartmentID”. The conflict occurred in database “test”, table “dbo.Projects”, column ‘DepartmentID’“, you’re probably trying to delete data from a parent table of a foreign key relationship.
Continue readingIf you’re getting SQL Server error 1785 that reads something like “Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint ‘FK__Name’ on table ‘Department’ may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints“, it’s probably because you’ve specified the CASCADE option when trying to create a foreign key with a circular reference, or one that has multiple cascade paths (perhaps your child table has multiple foreign keys to the same primary key on the parent table).